Search for: All records

Distributed clause-sharing SAT solvers can solve challenging problems hundreds of times faster than sequential SAT solvers by sharing derived information among multiple sequential solvers. Unlike sequential solvers, however, distributed solvers have not been able to produce proofs of unsatisfiability in a scalable manner, which limits their use in critical applications. In this work, we present a method to produce unsatisfiability proofs for distributed SAT solvers by combining the partial proofs produced by each sequential solver into a single, linear proof. We first describe a simple sequential algorithm and then present a fully distributed algorithm for proof composition, which is substantially more scalable and general than prior works. Our empirical evaluation with over 1500 solver threads shows that our distributed approach allows proof composition and checking within around 3x its own (highly competitive) solving time. 

The effectiveness of satisfiability solvers strongly depends on the quality of the encoding of a given problem into conjunctive normal form. Cardinality constraints are prevalent in numerous problems, prompting the development and study of various types of encoding. We present a novel approach to optimizing cardinality constraint encodings by exploring the impact of literal orderings within the constraints. By strategically placing related literals nearby each other, the encoding generates auxiliary variables in a hierarchical structure, enabling the solver to reason more abstractly about groups of related literals. Unlike conventional metrics such as formula size or propagation strength, our method leverages structural properties of the formula to redefine the roles of auxiliary variables to enhance the solver's learning capabilities. The experimental evaluation on benchmarks from the maximum satisfiability competition demonstrates that literal orderings can be more influential than the choice of the encoding type. Our literal ordering technique improves solver performance across various encoding techniques, underscoring the robustness of our approach. 

Satisfiability solvers have been instrumental in tackling hard problems, including mathematical challenges that require years of computation. A key obstacle in efficiently solving such problems lies in effectively partitioning them into many, frequently millions of subproblems. Existing automated partitioning techniques, primarily based on lookahead methods, perform well on some instances but fail to generate effective partitions for many others. This paper introduces a powerful partitioning approach that leverages prefixes of proofs derived from conflict-driven clause-learning solvers. This method enables non-experts to harness the power of massively parallel SAT solving for their problems. We also propose a semantically-driven partitioning technique tailored for problems with large cardinality constraints, which frequently arise in optimization tasks. We evaluate our methods on diverse benchmarks, including combinatorial problems and formulas from SAT and MaxSAT competitions. Our results demonstrate that these techniques outperform existing partitioning strategies in many cases, offering improved scalability and efficiency. 

We present a lightweight reencoding technique that augments propositional formulas containing implicit or explicit exactly-one constraints with auxiliary variables derived from the order encoding. Our approach is based on the observation that many formulas contain clauses where each literal appears only in that clause, and that these unique literal clauses can be replaced by the corresponding sequential counter encoding of exactly-one constraints, which introduces the same variables as the order encoding. We implemented the reencoding in the state-of-the-art SAT solver CaDiCaL with support for proof logging and solution reconstruction. Experiments on SAT Competition benchmarks demonstrate that our technique enables solving dozens of additional formulas. We found that shuffling a formula before reencoding harms performance. To mitigate this issue, we introduce a method that sorts literals within clauses based on the formula structure before applying our reencoding. The same technique also predicts whether reencoding is likely to yield improvements. 

Knowledge compilers convert Boolean formulas, given in conjunctive normal form (CNF), into representations that enable efficient evaluation of unweighted and weighted model counts, as well as a variety of other useful properties. With projected knowledge compilation, the generated representation describes the restriction of the formula to a designated set of data variables, with the remaining ones eliminated by existential quantification. Projected knowledge compilation has applications in a variety of domains, including formal verification and synthesis. This paper describes a formally verified proof framework for certifying the output of a projected knowledge compiler. It builds on an earlier clausal proof framework for certifying the output of a standard knowledge compiler. Extending the framework to projected compilation requires a method to represent Skolem assignments, describing how the quantified variables can be assigned, given an assignment for the data variables. We do so by extending the representation generated by the knowledge compiler to also encode Skolem assignments. We also refine the earlier framework, moving beyond purely clausal proofs to enable scaling certification to larger formulas. We present experimental results obtained by making small modifications to the D4 projected knowledge compiler and extensions of our earlier proof generator. We detail a soundness argument stating that a compiler output that passes our certifier is logically equivalent to the quantified input formula; the soundness argument has been formally validated using the HOL4 proof assistant. The checker also ensures that the compiler output satisfies the properties required for efficient unweighted and weighted model counting. We have developed two proof checkers for the certification framework: one written in C and designed for high performance and one written in CakeML and formally verified in HOL4. 

Computing many useful properties of Boolean formulas, such as their weighted or unweighted model count, is intractable on general representations. It can become tractable when formulas are expressed in a special form, such as the decision decomposable negation normal form (decision-DNNF). Knowledge compilation is the process of converting a formula into such a form. Unfortunately existing knowledge compilers provide no guarantee that their output correctly represents the original formula, and therefore they cannot validate a model count, or any other computed value.We present Partitioned-Operation Graphs (POGs), a form that can encode all of the representations used by existing knowledge compilers. We have designed CPOG, a framework that can express proofs of equivalence between a POG and a Boolean formula in conjunctive normal form (CNF).We have developed a program that generates POG representations from decision-DNNF graphs produced by the state-of-the-art knowledge compiler D4, as well as checkable CPOG proofs certifying that the output POGs are equivalent to the input CNF formulas. Our toolchain for generating and verifying POGs scales to all but the largest graphs produced by D4 for formulas from a recent model counting competition. Additionally, we have developed a formally verified CPOG checker and model counter for POGs in the Lean 4 proof assistant. In doing so, we proved the soundness of our proof framework. These programs comprise the first formally verified toolchain for weighted and unweighted model counting.